|
Jun 23/07 —
Parashat Chukat: How Can
Someone So “Right” Get Something So Wrong?
Commentary by
Rabbi Lawrence M. Pinsker
Having exhausted
their water supply, the Israelites in anger turn on Moses and Aaron.
God, however, has a plan to respond to the outcry of the people:
… the Lord spoke to
Moses, saying, “You and your brother Aaron take the rod and assemble
the community, and before their very eyes, order the rock to yield
its water. Thus you shall produce water for them from the rock and
provide drink for the congregation and their beasts.” Moses took the
rod from before the Lord, as He had commanded him. Moses and Aaron
assembled the congregation in front of the rock; and he said to
them, ‘Listen, you rebels, shall we get water for you out of this
rock?’ And Moses raised his hand and struck the rock twice with his
rod. Out came copious water, and the community and their beasts
drank. But the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, ‘Because you did not
trust in Me enough to affirm My sanctity in the sight of the
Israelite people, therefore you shall not lead this congregation
into the land that I have given them.’”
— Numbers 20: 7-12
What is Moses’
problem? Apparently Moses is deeply frustrated because of the
people’s repeated expressions of dissatisfaction and their demanding
behaviour. Instead of following God’s instructions and commanding
the rock to yield water, Moses hits it with his rod. Water does flow
out of the rock, but at a terrible cost. Water came forth and the
people’s needs were met, but for Moses and Aaron this is the end of
their role as leaders.
For centuries,
commentators have offered different explanations of why God
responded by reprimanding and punishing Moses and Aaron. A thousand
years ago Rashi said that striking the rock, rather than speaking to
it, diminished the impact of the miracle, which was not only to
provide water but lift the Israelites’ spirits. The medieval Spanish
commentator Moses ibn Ezra attributed the punishment to the fact
that Moses needed to be told to perform the miracle instead of being
confident that God would come through for the people.
In the 12th
century, Maimonides offered an intriguing explanation for Moses’
punishment. He believed that Moses was punished not because he
struck the rock, but rather because of the way he chose to speak to
the Israelites: “Listen, you rebels …” Maimonides said that
Moses had no reason at all to speak to the people as he did — they
were nearly dying of thirst and simply wanted to stay alive. That he
would speak harshly to them at such a time was unacceptable.
At times of stress
and frustration even the best among us can “lose it,” lashing out
even at someone who wants to help us. Feelings may be strong, but it
is unacceptable to unload them in a way that may damage relations or
magnify a crisis. Effective leaders, facilitators, caregivers,
family, and friends have an obligation to transcend the intensity of
their feelings and work hard at understanding what has triggered
their response. They cannot afford to take things personally,
especially when their visceral response is intense, as it was for
Moses. Not every word uttered in anger or frustration should be
taken personally. Most times, angry words have nothing to do with
the person at whom they are directed.
One final
suggestion: there are some commentators who suggest that God’s
response to Moses and Aaron’s action was not punishment, but rather
recognition of a need to change leadership. Every healthy
organization is engaged in constant change, marked by processing of
new issues and concerns that may require different leadership
qualities. Healthy institutions welcome such change.
Moses and Aaron
brought the newly-formed Jewish people to the borders of the land
promised to them by God. Entering the Land meant facing new
challenges with new faces, new ideas, and new leaders — in this
instance, Moses’ designated successor, Joshua, and his companion,
Caleb, the only two of the twelve Israelite princes who scouted the
land and returned with a clear, positive report about its goodness.
Change is never
easy. Sometimes it is difficult and painful, but continued growth as
a civilization, as a people, as an individual, demands it. Harold
Wilson, the late Prime Minister of Great Britain, said it well:
“He who rejects
change is the architect of decay. The only human institution which
rejects progress is the cemetery.”
Shabbat Shalom.
|