|
July 23/05
- Shabbat Pinchas: Time Changes Everything
Commentary
by Rabbi Lawrence Pinsker
“Time
changes everything.” The homily seems the height of triteness, yet
there are times when it’s important to remember that it applies even
to what we believe are “eternal truths.”
Take
the story of Pinchas in this week’s Torah portion. The story began
at the end of last week’s reading. Pinchas, the grandson of Aaron,
the High Priest, kills Zimri and Cozbi, an Israelite prince and a
Moabite woman who has seduced him, as they defy a Divine ban on
sexual relations between the two peoples. For his act of zealous
violence, Pinchas is rewarded by God:
… And
the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Pinchas, the son of Eleazar, the
son of Aaron the priest, has turned my anger away from the people of
Israel by being zealous for My sake among them—so that I did not
consume the people Israel in my anger.
Therefore I say, Behold, I give to him my covenant of peace; and he
and his descendants after him shall have it: the covenant of an
everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made
atonement for the people of Israel.
God
vindicates the act of killing two people on the grounds that, had
Pinchas not done this, God would have brought even greater
devastation upon the people for their rejection of the limits God
placed on their sexual activity.
But
before you think that this notion of divine justification for
violence is an absolute license for religiously-motivated killing,
take note of the history of this idea. It has a peculiar life within
Judaism. Some of our ancient commentators celebrate the notion that
some of our people are truly impassioned about God and about their
fellow Jews living up to Jewish ideas—even at the risk of doing harm
to other Jews. Still others, however, offer criticism of Pinchas’
zeal. Some midrashim say that God gives Pinchas the blessing of
"peace" not as a reward but as a corrective to his murderous
zeal—that the act shocked even God, who turns away from committing a
similar act because of the horror of Pinchas’ deed.
Many
years ago, Prof. Moshe Greenberg observed that "The Bible and the
Torah are multi-faceted and of evolving applicability. Each
generation, beginning with the Talmudic rabbis, emphasized those
aspects [of Torah] which they found necessary, and lost or ignored
those aspects which were not relevant [to their purposes]." As each
of us reads any text, we enter the commentary process that affirms,
challenges, and clarifies Jewish beliefs and values for our time.
There
is a tragic, chilling example of this from our own very recent
history. For years, the weekly Torah commentary on Parashat Pinchas
from Israel’s National Religious Party praised Pinchas’ zealousness
without reservation. They celebrate God’s sanctioning of murder in
order to rid Israel of evil-doers, and hail Pinchas for having
learned how to be zealous from those very evil-doers.
That
changed in 1996, when the National Religious Party’s commentary on
Pinchas began with an essay explaining that God gave Pinchas the
gift of a permanent place in the priesthood in order to divert his
murderous zeal into the routines of religious ritual. Other
commentaries declared that Jewish tradition overwhelmingly opposed
violent religious zealotry as an impractical means for creating a
society devoted to God because zealotry is seductive, manipulative,
and easily corrupted—and can lead to mass murder and endless war
both within society and between societies.
What
led to this change in outlook? Tragically, the watershed event was
the murder of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995.
The
use of tradition, then, is not a matter of citing a few
quotations—no matter how clear they may seem. We are warned not to
make poor choices in what we quote to justify our actions. Every
time we seek instruction from the great wisdom of the past, we need
to remember that its power to influence us and change things
derives from us. We have to use our past responsibly. And the
past can never take away our obligation to think for ourselves.
Shabbat Shalom.
|